<<BACK TO HOME

     
Brakes, Steering, Suspension
Car Companies
Commercial Vehicles
Design/Bodywork
Drivetrain
Electronics
Emissions
Fuel Cells/Batteries
Hybrids
Interiors
Lighting
Manufacturing
Materials
Motorsport
Powertrain
Rapid Prototyping
Safety
Software
Supply Chain
Telematics
Testing

Vehicle Design Highlights

 

ARCHIVES

Business News
Technology News
   
 

Magna China

Keith Lomason – Executive Director, Business Development Magna International, China

What social/economic/technological/political trends do you think will have the greatest impact on car design in China in 2018?

Obviously, environmental factors are driving changes to the propulsion systems of the automobile, and this will be no exception in China. With alternative power sources comes a need for lighter weight materials as well, so these two trends will be coupled together for at least the next decade.

What will be the state of the Chinese industry in 2018?
Very probably the China auto industry will be the largest and most influential in the world. While China will probably have more manufacturers than any other country, it will be a fraction of what it is today. Assuming all of the foreign OEMs that are here today survive in China and globally until 2018, there will probably be 10 Chinese OEMs that are in the global auto arena. The industry will be strong, and by 2018 should be leading the world in exports and certain technologies - emission control, perhaps battery development and certainly in mass transit.

In what ways will the technology differ from today?
China could end up leading the fields of emission control, alternative propulsion systems and mass transit. This is due to the critical mass of the PRC market making it both an attractive arena for manufacturing and sales and with that, potentially the most polluting market in the world - something I believe neither China’s government or its citizens will tolerate.

How will Chinese OEMs develop?
There are three distinct paths being followed today: partnership with a foreign OEM; acquiring overseas companies and/or their rights to vehicles or major systems; and growing internally with support purchased from the global supply base.
Partnerships with foreign OEMs have not given the Chinese partners everything they were expecting or hoping for, and it is unsure if or for how long the partnership requirement will be in force for foreign OEMs. In most cases, the forced partnership is not what the foreign partner sees as an optimum relationship, and if the rules change there will probably be several separations.

This will not happen, however, at least until several Chinese OEMs have firmly established themselves as legitimate global players. SAIC, Nanjing Auto and FAW, in addition to having their foreign partnerships are also following a path of acquiring overseas companies and/or the rights to manufacture certain products. This approach will see some success, but will also be subject to the same disappointments that the OEM joint ventures have experienced – technology will be slower to be absorbed than many of the Chinese partners will have wanted because it will not have been internally developed. Chery, Geely, and a handful of other non-partnered OEMs are growing their expertise internally, and supporting their shortcomings with technology, product and systems purchases from competent global Tier-1 suppliers. Although this may seem like the longest way to go, with technology shortening the learning curve dramatically this may end up being the shortest route to true independent capabilities for a PRC OEM. Short term suffering in lack of technologically advanced designs or integration will eventually become long term gain on having home-grown knowledge that has been exposed to a globally competitive market.

Next... Magneti Marelli

Index


 


 

 

January 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 






 

         
        [BACK TO TOP]